最新æļˆæ¯

27 July 2026

𝗜đ—ēđ—Ŋđ—ŧđ—ŋ𝘁𝗮đ—ģ𝗰𝗲 đ—ŧđ—ŗ 𝗲𝘅đ—Ŋ𝗲đ—ŋ𝘁 𝗲𝘃đ—ļ𝗱𝗲đ—ģ𝗰𝗲 𝗮đ—ģ𝗱 đ—Ŋđ—ŋđ—ŧđ—Ŋ𝗲đ—ŋ đ—ļđ—ģ𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁đ—ļ𝗴𝗮𝘁đ—ļđ—ŧđ—ģ đ—ļđ—ģ 𝗰đ—ŋđ—ļđ—ēđ—ļđ—ģ𝗮𝗹 𝘁đ—ŋđ—ļ𝗮𝗹

In HKSAR v. Chiu Chung Yuen [2025] HKCFI 6172; HCCC 2/2024, Andrew Raffell and Phoebe Lau acted for the Defendant (“D”), who was charged with one count of Murder.

In trial, D took the witness box and gave the following evidence: - 

Being terrified by the chain of events, D came up with 6 versions of the events to the authority and 3 VRIs were conducted. However, it is worth noting that the version of events given by D after caution corroborates with what D said in his 3rd VRI and his evidence given in trial.

The government pathologist, a Prosecution witness, in the Autopsy Report, her witness statements and in her evidence given in trial under cross-examination, agreed with D’s version of events, that the wound of the Deceased fit in what D said in his 3rd VRI and D’s evidence given in trial.

After an 8-day trial, the jury returned unanimous verdicts of acquittal of Murder and guilty of Manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act. D was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 10 years (after deducting a 1/3 discount due to his guilty plea to manslaughter at the earliest opportunity).

In this case, the importance of a proper investigation and expert evidence in a criminal trial and how the outcome of a criminal case could have turned out differently with a proper investigation are illustrated.

æˆå“ĄæĒ”æĄˆīŧšåŽ‰č¯æš‰å¤§åž‹å¸ĢåŠåŠ‰įššæˇ‡å¤§åž‹å¸Ģ